The impending Ethereum merge — the long-anticipated transition from Proof-of-Work (PoW) to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) — has sparked widespread discussion across the crypto community. In a recent speech, Vitalik Buterin noted that users who prefer PoW can consider Ethereum Classic (ETC), highlighting it as a viable alternative blockchain. With Ethereum expected to complete its merge in 2025, miners relying on GPU-based PoW mining face an uncertain future. As Ethereum becomes inaccessible to miners, many are turning their attention to ETC, which shares the same hashing algorithm (Ethash) and remains a PoW blockchain.
This shift has reignited interest in Ethereum Classic. But what does the Ethereum merge really mean for ETC? Will it lead to sustained growth, or is this just a temporary surge in attention? Let’s dive deep into the relationship between ETH and ETC, explore their similarities and differences, and assess how the merge could impact ETC’s future.
👉 Discover how blockchain transitions are reshaping mining opportunities
The Origins of Ethereum and Ethereum Classic
Ethereum (ETH) is the second-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization and hosts the most extensive ecosystem of decentralized applications (DApps). It’s synonymous with smart contracts and decentralized finance (DeFi), powering thousands of projects worldwide.
Ethereum Classic (ETC), on the other hand, is often overlooked despite being the original Ethereum blockchain. Both chains share a common origin, but a pivotal event in 2016 led to their permanent divergence: the DAO hack.
The DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) was one of the first major DApp projects built on Ethereum. It allowed users to fund and vote on new projects using ETH. However, a critical vulnerability was exploited in June 2016, resulting in the theft of approximately $50 million worth of ETH.
In response, the majority of the Ethereum community supported a hard fork to reverse the transaction and return funds to affected users. This new chain retained the name Ethereum (ETH).
But a faction of users opposed this intervention, arguing that blockchain should be immutable — “code is law.” These users continued on the original chain, which became known as Ethereum Classic (ETC).
Since the split, the two blockchains have evolved very differently. While ETH became a dominant force in DeFi and Web3, ETC remained a niche platform with limited adoption.
Key Similarities Between ETH and ETC
Despite their philosophical and technical divergence, Ethereum and Ethereum Classic share several core traits:
- Proof-of-Work Consensus: Both networks currently use PoW for block validation. However, ETH has already launched its PoS beacon chain and plans to fully transition in 2025.
- Smart Contract Capability: Both support smart contracts and can host DApps.
- Transaction Throughput: Theoretical maximum throughput is similar — around 15–20 transactions per second (TPS).
These shared foundations make ETC a natural fallback option for miners displaced by the Ethereum merge.
Major Differences Between ETH and ETC
Philosophy and Immutability
The core distinction lies in ideology. Ethereum Classic adheres strictly to the principle of immutability, summarized by its motto: “Code is Law.” Its community believes that no external intervention — not even to fix hacks — should alter the blockchain’s history.
Ethereum, by contrast, embraces pragmatism. The DAO fork demonstrated its willingness to adapt for security and user protection. This flexibility extends to upgrades like the merge, sharding, and future scalability improvements.
Security Concerns
The DAO incident wasn’t the only security challenge. ETC has suffered multiple 51% attacks, notably in January 2019 and August 2020 (three separate incidents). These attacks allowed malicious actors to double-spend ETC, severely damaging trust in the network.
Some exchanges temporarily suspended ETC trading due to these vulnerabilities. In contrast, Ethereum’s larger hash rate and active development have made it far more resistant to such attacks.
Supply Mechanics
- Ethereum (ETH): No hard cap on supply. Annual inflation is currently around 0.5%, kept low through EIP-1559 fee burning.
- Ethereum Classic (ETC): Capped at 210,700,000 tokens, with mining rewards halving every 5 million blocks. Despite this cap, ETC’s current inflation rate is about 5% per year — significantly higher than ETH’s.
While ETC is technically deflationary in the long term, its short-term inflation undermines this advantage.
DApp and DeFi Ecosystem
This is where the gap becomes most apparent:
- Ethereum: Hosts over 3,000 DApps, with Total Value Locked (TVL) in DeFi exceeding $123 billion.
- Ethereum Classic: Supports fewer than 50 active DApps, with TVL around $112 million — over 1,000 times smaller than Ethereum’s.
The lack of developer activity and institutional interest limits ETC’s utility and growth potential.
Transaction Speed and Fees
- TPS: Ethereum averages ~15 TPS (near capacity), while ETC averages just ~1 TPS.
- Fees: This is ETC’s strongest advantage. Average transaction fees are fractions of a cent, compared to Ethereum’s average of $18–$41, especially during peak congestion.
Low fees make ETC attractive for microtransactions and cost-sensitive use cases.
👉 Explore low-cost blockchain networks with growing miner interest
How Will the Ethereum Merge Impact ETC?
The merge will eliminate ETH mining, displacing thousands of miners worldwide. Many are expected to redirect their hardware toward ETC, given its compatibility with Ethash.
This influx could bring both opportunities and risks:
Potential Benefits
- Increased Hash Rate: More miners mean greater network security — if sustained.
- Higher Visibility: Renewed attention may attract speculative investment.
- Short-Term Price Surge: Historical trends show ETC often rallies ahead of major ETH events.
Risks and Challenges
- Security Vulnerabilities: A sudden spike in mining power could make 51% attacks more profitable if not properly mitigated.
- Speculative Bubble: Much of ETC’s recent performance lacks fundamental backing. Without real-world adoption, gains may be temporary.
- Limited Roadmap: Unlike Ethereum’s aggressive upgrade path (e.g., rollups, danksharding), ETC lacks a clear vision for scalability or mass adoption.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Will Ethereum Classic replace Ethereum after the merge?
A: No. ETC lacks the ecosystem, security, and development momentum to compete with ETH. It may absorb displaced miners but won’t surpass Ethereum in relevance.
Q: Is ETC a good investment post-merge?
A: High risk, speculative. While mining interest may boost short-term price action, long-term value depends on solving security issues and growing its DApp ecosystem — neither of which is guaranteed.
Q: Can I mine ETC with my old ETH mining rig?
A: Yes. Since both use Ethash, your existing GPU or ASIC miners can switch to ETC with minimal configuration changes.
Q: Why do some people still support ETC?
A: Ideological commitment to immutability and resistance to centralized decision-making. For some, ETC represents “pure” blockchain philosophy.
Q: Could ETC become deflationary?
A: Eventually. With a capped supply and periodic reward reductions, ETC will approach deflation over decades — assuming consistent network activity.
Final Outlook
The Ethereum merge will undoubtedly bring temporary attention and mining activity to Ethereum Classic. For displaced miners, ETC offers a familiar, low-barrier alternative. Its ultra-low fees and ideological appeal ensure it won’t disappear.
However, structural weaknesses — recurring 51% attacks, minimal DeFi presence, and weak fundamentals — limit its potential for long-term growth. Without significant improvements in security and ecosystem development, ETC may remain a niche player.
While the post-merge spotlight might lift ETC’s price temporarily, sustainable success requires more than just miner migration. True adoption will depend on attracting developers, institutions, and real-world use cases — a challenge yet to be met.
👉 Stay ahead of blockchain shifts with real-time market insights