The cryptocurrency market experienced a sharp correction over the weekend as Bitcoin dipped below the $100,000 milestone, marking a pivotal moment in its volatile journey. The drop, which saw Bitcoin fall as low as **$99,191**, was triggered by escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and a broader risk-off sentiment across global financial markets. This sudden downturn not only rattled crypto investors but also reignited debates among top industry figures about Bitcoin’s role as a safe haven, its correlation with traditional assets, and the psychology behind market sell-offs.
Geopolitical Shockwaves Trigger Risk-Off Move
The sell-off began after the United States launched airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, prompting immediate retaliation from Iran. These developments intensified fears of a wider regional conflict, sending shockwaves through global markets. Investors swiftly moved to de-risk their portfolios, selling off high-volatility assets—including tech stocks and cryptocurrencies.
Bitcoin, often touted for its independence from traditional financial systems, proved vulnerable to macro-level instability. Despite its decentralized nature, BTC’s price action mirrored that of other risk assets. The 24/7 trading nature of crypto made it an easy target for rapid deleveraging, especially in derivatives markets where margin calls amplified the downturn.
👉 Discover how global events influence digital asset trends and what it means for your portfolio.
Altcoins Follow Suit in Broad Market Pullback
The pain wasn’t isolated to Bitcoin. Ethereum, Solana, and other major altcoins also suffered double-digit percentage losses in a synchronized market retreat. The correlation between BTC and the broader crypto market remained strong, underscoring Bitcoin’s role as a market leader and sentiment barometer.
Derivatives data revealed a wave of liquidations across major exchanges, with over $800 million in long positions wiped out within 24 hours. This cascade effect deepened the decline, as automated stop-loss triggers and algorithmic trading exacerbated price drops during low-liquidity weekend sessions.
Expert Perspectives: Diverging Views on Bitcoin’s Role
Amid the turmoil, prominent voices in the crypto space offered contrasting interpretations of the crash.
Pierre Rochard: Bitcoin as a Global Deleveraging Tool
Pierre Rochard, CEO of Bitcoin Bond, offered a nuanced take on why Bitcoin was among the first assets to be sold:
“Bitcoin has dipped below $100k not because the network relies on the Strait of Hormuz, not because the asset is over-leveraged, but because it’s the easiest to sell globally 24/7 for deleveraging other assets. There’s utility in accumulating it when times are good.”
Rochard’s insight highlights a critical but often overlooked reality: Bitcoin’s liquidity and accessibility make it a preferred instrument for portfolio rebalancing during crises—even if it isn’t fundamentally at risk.
Peter Schiff: Skepticism Amid Correlation with Risk Assets
Longtime gold advocate and Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff seized the moment to question BTC’s status as an inflation hedge or safe haven:
“Other than @saylor, who’s buying the dip below $100k?”
He further pointed out Bitcoin’s growing correlation with equities:
“Bitcoin is down over 4% from where it traded when U.S. stocks closed on Friday. Given Bitcoin’s positive correlation with risk assets and negative correlation with gold, that indicates that stock futures will open lower and gold higher. Tonight’s session could be interesting.”
Schiff’s observations underscore concerns that Bitcoin may be evolving into a speculative tech-like asset rather than fulfilling its original promise as a decentralized store of value.
Arthur Hayes: Bullish Outlook Amid Crisis
In contrast, Arthur Hayes, former CEO of BitMEX and a staunch Bitcoin bull, maintained an optimistic stance:
“Do you hear that? … it’s the sound of the money printers revving up to do their patriotic duty. This weakness shall pass and $BTC will leave no doubt as to its safe haven status.”
Hayes’ message reflects a belief in eventual monetary expansion by central banks in response to geopolitical stress—a scenario historically favorable to hard assets like Bitcoin.
Core Keywords & Market Implications
This event underscores several key themes central to understanding modern crypto markets:
- Bitcoin price crash
- Crypto market volatility
- Geopolitical risk impact
- Bitcoin as safe haven
- Derivatives liquidation
- Risk asset correlation
- Market sentiment analysis
- Macroeconomic influences
These keywords reflect both investor concerns and analytical frameworks used to interpret price movements. While some had hoped Bitcoin would decouple from traditional markets during crises, this episode suggests that macro sentiment and liquidity dynamics still dominate short-term behavior.
Is Bitcoin Still a Safe Haven?
The recurring question—whether Bitcoin can serve as a safe haven—remains unresolved. On one hand, its fixed supply and censorship-resistant design align with properties of sound money. On the other, its high volatility and speculative trading volume make it behave more like a risk asset during market stress.
Historically, gold rises during geopolitical turmoil while equities fall. In this case, gold prices increased while Bitcoin declined—supporting Schiff’s argument about negative correlation. However, Hayes’ counterpoint—that central banks will eventually respond with stimulus—suggests that Bitcoin could rebound strongly once panic subsides.
FAQ: Addressing Investor Questions
Q: Why did Bitcoin fall below $100K?
A: The drop was primarily driven by geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and Iran, leading to a broad sell-off in risk assets. Bitcoin’s high liquidity made it a target for quick deleveraging.
Q: Is Bitcoin still correlated with stock markets?
A: Yes. Despite its decentralized nature, Bitcoin has shown increasing correlation with tech stocks and other risk-on assets during periods of market stress.
Q: Are altcoins likely to recover soon?
A: Recovery depends on broader market sentiment. If geopolitical tensions ease and liquidity returns, altcoins may rebound—but likely after Bitcoin stabilizes.
Q: Should I buy the dip?
A: That depends on your risk tolerance and investment horizon. Long-term holders may view pullbacks as accumulation opportunities, while short-term traders should monitor macro developments closely.
Q: How do derivatives affect crypto prices?
A: High leverage in futures markets can lead to cascading liquidations during sharp moves, amplifying price swings—exactly what occurred during this crash.
Q: Can Bitcoin become a true safe haven?
A: It has the potential, but currently behaves more like a speculative asset during crises. Over time, reduced volatility and wider adoption could shift this dynamic.
Looking Ahead: What’s Next for Bitcoin?
Despite the setback, Bitcoin remains up significantly year-to-date in 2025, reflecting strong underlying demand. The current correction serves as a reminder that crypto markets are still maturing and highly sensitive to external shocks.
As traditional trading resumes and policymakers assess the situation in the Middle East, market direction will hinge on whether equities stabilize or continue downward. For now, caution prevails—and capital continues flowing out of crypto at a rapid pace.
However, history shows that after every major pullback, new narratives emerge. Whether driven by institutional adoption, regulatory clarity, or macroeconomic shifts, the next leg of Bitcoin’s journey could begin once fear gives way to opportunity.
👉 Stay ahead of market cycles with real-time insights and secure trading tools.