The global financial landscape is undergoing a profound shift, driven by rapid advancements in blockchain technology, digital assets, and decentralized finance. As traditional banking institutions face increasing pressure to innovate, Web3.0 and virtual assets have emerged as pivotal forces shaping the future of finance. A recent report by OKLink Research, Global Banking Crypto Landscape 2023, has sparked widespread discussion among financial institutions and regulators alike—highlighting that crypto adoption is no longer optional but a strategic imperative.
At the forefront of this transformation is Chen Zhitang, a seasoned banking professional with decades of industry experience and deep expertise in Web3.0 and digital assets. In his thought-provoking essay, Digital Transformation Thinking: Web3.0 and Banks, Chen argues that while virtual asset investment and real-world asset tokenization (RWA) are gaining traction, stablecoins represent the most viable and natural fit for traditional banks—offering a clear, low-risk entry point into the crypto ecosystem.
The Strategic Role of Hong Kong in Global Web3.0 Development
Hong Kong has rapidly positioned itself as a leading hub for virtual asset innovation. Since 2018, the city has introduced regulatory frameworks for digital assets, but it was in 2023 that its proactive policy shift truly captured global attention. Amid strict crypto bans in mainland China and stringent U.S. regulations, Hong Kong stands out as a bridge between East and West—balancing innovation with oversight.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) and Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) have jointly advanced practical policies, including licensing virtual asset service providers (VASPs) like HashKey and OSL. Notably, the HKMA has urged banks to open accounts for licensed crypto firms—a rare call to action that underscores the government’s commitment.
👉 Discover how financial institutions can leverage emerging digital asset trends to stay competitive.
Yet, despite regulatory clarity, most banks remain hesitant. This gap presents a unique opportunity: early adopters can capture market share, build brand equity, and reshape their business models before competitors catch up.
Global Banking Responses to Virtual Assets
While crypto was once seen as fringe, major financial players are now embracing it. In 2023:
- BlackRock filed for a spot Bitcoin ETF, signaling institutional validation.
- PayPal launched PYUSD, its own regulated stablecoin, marking tech giants’ entry into digital currency.
- Banks like DBS Bank in Singapore launched digital asset exchanges for institutional clients.
Even though Silvergate Bank and Signature Bank ultimately collapsed due to liquidity issues during the 2023 U.S. rate hikes, their earlier success demonstrated a powerful model: crypto-friendly banks can attract massive low-cost deposits through real-time payment networks like Silvergate’s SEN (Silvergate Exchange Network).
These systems enable 24/7 instant settlements—far surpassing traditional banking hours—and have proven capable of drawing billions in customer funds without offering interest. For banks struggling to compete with larger peers for low-cost deposits, such models offer a transformative solution.
In Hong Kong, ZA Bank, the city’s largest virtual bank, is already piloting fiat-crypto exchange services. By acting as a settlement bank for licensed platforms, it allows users to deposit crypto and withdraw fiat—paving the way for broader adoption.
Why Stablecoins Are the Ideal Entry Point for Banks
Among various virtual asset strategies—direct crypto investment, RWA tokenization, and stablecoin issuance—stablecoins align best with core banking functions:
- They operate on blockchain but maintain parity with fiat currencies.
- They support fast, low-cost cross-border transactions.
- They generate seigniorage-like profits through reserve investments.
There are three primary types of stablecoins:
- Asset-backed (e.g., USDC, USDT): 1:1 backed by cash or short-term securities; high stability and capital efficiency but centralized.
- Crypto-collateralized (e.g., DAI): Decentralized and stable but require over-collateralization, reducing capital efficiency.
- Algorithmic (e.g., UST): Capital-efficient and decentralized but prone to instability due to untested mechanisms.
This trade-off is known as the “stablecoin trilemma”—no design can simultaneously achieve full stability, decentralization, and capital efficiency. Given this, regulators favor asset-backed models, which are transparent and less risky.
👉 Learn how banks can integrate compliant stablecoin solutions into their operations.
In Hong Kong, only regulated asset-backed stablecoins are permitted. This excludes non-compliant issuers like Tether (USDT), favoring regulated players such as Circle (USDC) and Paxos (PYUSD) as ideal banking partners.
Strategic Business Opportunities for Banks
1. Serve Individual Customers with On- and Off-Ramps
The most immediate opportunity lies in facilitating fiat-to-stablecoin conversions for retail investors. Banks can offer:
- Outbound transfers to regulated stablecoin issuers (standard AML/KYC applies).
- Inbound receipts from compliant platforms (equivalent to regular wire inflows).
- Direct exchange services via partnerships with licensed issuers.
This creates new revenue from transaction fees and strengthens customer relationships—especially with younger, tech-savvy demographics.
2. Provide Banking Services to Licensed VASPs
With only a few banks willing to serve VASPs, early movers can dominate this niche. Services include:
- Operating accounts for licensed exchanges like HashKey and OSL.
- Enabling deposit/withdrawal rails between users and platforms.
- Offering custody solutions if exchanges issue their own stablecoins.
This not only diversifies income but also positions banks at the heart of the digital asset ecosystem.
3. Build Real-Time Settlement Networks
As client volume grows, banks can develop internal 24/7 payment systems inspired by Silvergate’s SEN. These allow instant intra-bank transfers between crypto clients—boosting liquidity and user experience while minimizing operational costs.
Such infrastructure could eventually interconnect with other banks or even form a regional digital settlement layer—mirroring SWIFT’s role in traditional finance.
Tangible Benefits of Bank Participation
✅ Strong Brand Differentiation
Positioning as a “crypto-ready” bank generates significant media exposure and digital engagement. For smaller institutions, this can redefine public perception and attract innovation-focused clients.
✅ Improved Customer Demographics
Crypto users are predominantly Gen Z and Millennials—a demographic often underserved by traditional banks. By offering crypto services, banks can reverse aging customer bases and future-proof their user profiles.
Additionally, firms in Hong Kong’s thriving Web3.0 ecosystem—such as those based in Cyberport—are likely to choose banks that support their operations.
For mainland Chinese residents barred from domestic crypto trading, a Hong Kong bank account becomes a gateway—potentially shifting tourism spending from luxury goods to digital assets.
✅ Profitability Through Stablecoin Reserves
Stablecoin issuers earn substantial returns by investing reserves in U.S. Treasuries and high-grade bonds. For example:
- Tether (USDT) reported over $4 billion in profits in 2023.
- With minimal staff, it outperformed asset managers like BlackRock on profit-per-employee.
Banks participating in stablecoin ecosystems—even indirectly—can access similar low-cost funding pools to fuel lending and investment activities, improving net interest margins.
✅ Transformation of Core Banking Products
Integrating virtual assets enables fundamental innovation:
- Settlements: Stablecoins on Ethereum enable real-time, SWIFT-free clearing.
- Lending: Crypto-collateralized loans offer faster processing and higher liquidity than traditional secured loans.
- Asset Tokenization: Tokenized time deposits could be partially transferred with accrued interest—unlocking new liquidity options.
- KYC/Identity: Using “soulbound tokens” (SBTs), banks can create reusable digital identities across partner networks.
- Custody: Private key management services extend traditional safekeeping into the digital realm.
Addressing Key Risks
Despite the opportunities, banks must navigate three major challenges:
1. Regulatory & Compliance Risk
Crypto transactions pose AML/CFT challenges due to pseudonymity. To mitigate this:
- The HKMA should issue clear anti-money laundering guidelines for virtual asset flows.
- Banks must implement robust transaction monitoring systems tailored to blockchain activity.
2. Technological Risk
Blockchain operations require new skills in key management, smart contract auditing, and cybersecurity. Banks should:
- Invest in training and hire specialized talent.
- Partner with trusted fintech providers for custody and infrastructure.
3. Geopolitical & Strategic Risk
Given mainland China’s crypto ban, Hong Kong banks with mainland operations face policy uncertainty. To reduce hesitation:
- The Hong Kong government should formally clarify that local-compliant virtual asset activities do not violate mainland regulations.
- Clear communication will empower banks to act confidently within legal boundaries.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Why should traditional banks care about stablecoins?
A: Stablecoins offer banks new revenue streams, attract younger customers, enable real-time payments, and provide access to low-cost deposits—transforming both profitability and product design.
Q: Are stablecoins safe for banks to engage with?
A: Regulated asset-backed stablecoins like USDC are considered low-risk when managed under proper compliance frameworks. Their reserves are audited and primarily held in safe instruments like U.S. Treasuries.
Q: Can banks issue their own stablecoins?
A: While possible, most banks will initially partner with licensed issuers. Issuing a native stablecoin requires significant regulatory approval, capital reserves, and technical infrastructure.
Q: How do stablecoins generate profit for issuers?
A: Issuers invest the fiat reserves backing stablecoins into interest-bearing assets like government bonds. The difference between reserve returns and operational costs creates profit—similar to traditional banking spreads.
Q: Will offering crypto services conflict with mainland China’s regulations?
A: If conducted within Hong Kong’s legal framework and without facilitating illegal cross-border transactions, such services comply with local laws. However, coordination between Hong Kong and central authorities remains crucial for long-term clarity.
Q: What’s stopping more banks from entering this space today?
A: Fear of compliance complexity, lack of internal expertise, and uncertainty about cross-jurisdictional rules are key barriers. However, these can be overcome through phased implementation and regulatory collaboration.
👉 Explore how your institution can begin its Web3.0 journey with secure, compliant solutions.
The integration of Web3.0, stablecoins, and digital assets into banking is not a distant future—it’s already unfolding in Hong Kong and beyond. Banks that act now can lead this transformation, capturing first-mover advantages in branding, customer acquisition, and financial innovation. The time for strategic digital transformation is here.